As March Madness kicks off, many fans are eagerly filling out their brackets, hoping to predict the victors of the NCAA Division I basketball championships. However, what if the winners were determined not by their athletic prowess but by their academic achievements?
Every year since 2006, Inside Higher Ed has taken on this unique challenge. They use the NCAA’s academic progress rate (APR) to determine which teams would come out on top if academic performance were the key to victory. The results for the 2022–23 academic year have just been released, and the Clemson University Tigers have emerged as the champions, besting the University of Louisville in the final showdown. Let’s delve into the details of this intriguing academic bracket and celebrate the academic achievements of student-athletes.
The Importance of Academic Performance in Collegiate Athletics
While athletic success often takes center stage during March Madness, the academic achievements of student-athletes are equally important.
The NCAA’s academic progress rate (APR) is a key metric used to measure student-athlete retention and academic eligibility. The APR provides a comprehensive overview of how well athletic programs are supporting their student-athletes in their academic pursuits.
Understanding the Academic Progress Rate (APR)
The APR is calculated based on the academic eligibility and retention of student-athletes. Each student-athlete receiving financial aid earns one point for staying in school and one point for remaining academically eligible.
The total points are then divided by the maximum possible points and multiplied by 1,000 to get the team’s APR score. A perfect score is 1,000, indicating that all student-athletes are staying in school and maintaining their academic eligibility.
Determining the Academic Bracket Winners
To determine the winners of the academic bracket, Inside Higher Ed used the most recent APR data available for the 2022–23 academic year.
Find the best accommodations
Check availability at 5* hotels, guest houses and apartments rated "superb" or "exceptional" by visitors just like you.
NO RESERVATION FEES
CHECK AVAILABILITY FOR YOUR DATES HERE
In cases where teams had the same APR, the 2023–24 graduation success rate (GSR) was used as a tiebreaker. The GSR measures the proportion of student-athletes who graduate within six years of entering an institution.
If teams were still tied, the six-year federal graduation rate was used as the final tiebreaker.
Key Matchups and Nail-Biting Victories
The academic bracket featured several exciting matchups and close calls. For instance, Clemson University tied with Liberty University on both the APR and GSR metrics. However, when the overall graduation rate was considered, Clemson edged out Liberty by just one point, securing their spot in the Final Four.
The Tigers then went on to defeat the University of Louisville in the championship matchup, emerging as the academic champions of March Madness.
Celebrating Academic Achievements
While the Inside Higher Ed bracket may not win fans any money, it serves as a valuable reminder of the importance of academic success in collegiate athletics.
Celebrating the academic achievements of student-athletes alongside their athletic prowess highlights the dual commitment these individuals make to excel both on and off the court.
The Role of Educational Institutions
Educational institutions play a crucial role in supporting the academic success of student-athletes. By providing resources such as academic advising, tutoring, and study halls, colleges and universities help ensure that student-athletes can balance their rigorous athletic schedules with their academic responsibilities.
The success of programs like Clemson’s demonstrates the positive impact that a strong support system can have on student-athlete achievement.
Looking Ahead: The Future of Academic Metrics in Athletics
The use of academic metrics like the APR and GSR to evaluate athletic programs is likely to continue evolving.
While these metrics provide valuable insights into the academic performance of student-athletes, some experts argue that they may not paint a complete picture. For example, the APR does not account for student-athletes who transfer to other institutions or pursue professional careers before graduating.
Potential Improvements and Innovations
As the landscape of collegiate athletics continues to change, there may be opportunities to develop new metrics that more accurately reflect the academic experiences of student-athletes. Innovations such as tracking long-term career outcomes and post-graduation success could provide a more comprehensive understanding of how well athletic programs are preparing student-athletes for life beyond sports.
Conclusion
The results of the Inside Higher Ed academic bracket offer a unique perspective on March Madness. They shift the focus from athletic achievements to academic success. By celebrating the academic progress and graduation rates of student-athletes, we can appreciate the full scope of their dedication and hard work.
As we enjoy the excitement of the NCAA basketball championships, let’s also take a moment to recognize and applaud the academic accomplishments of these remarkable individuals.
For more information on the academic bracket and to see the full results, visit Inside Higher Ed.
- Schools Covered
- College Football Articles
- Men's College Basketball Articles
- Men's College Soccer Articles
- Women's College Basketball Articles
- Olympic Athlete Articles
- Men's College Baseball Articles
- College Sports Media Professionals Articles
- Hall of Fame Member Articles
- Former College Player Articles
- Game Previews