Olivia Dunne, LSU gymnast and social media sensation, recently addressed the new NCAA gymnastics rules and their impact on the sport. She raised concerns about the scoring system and its effect on fan engagement and transparency.
The changes were introduced by the Women’s Collegiate Gymnastics Association (WCGA) in May 2024. The goal was to bring more fairness to the sport. However, Dunne’s comments have sparked a debate about the state of NCAA gymnastics and the need for further reforms.
The New NCAA Gymnastics Rules
In May 2024, the WCGA introduced the Collegiate Judging Issue (CJI), a system designed to improve fairness in gymnastics by evaluating judges as well as gymnasts. The goal was to address inconsistencies in scoring, which had become a significant issue in recent years.
With the NCAA season kicking off in January 2025, the effectiveness of these changes was put to the test.
Olivia Dunne’s Criticism
LSU gymnast Olivia Dunne voiced her concerns about the new scoring system after the Tigers narrowly lost to Arkansas in their latest meet. She took to social media to address fans’ confusion about NCAA gymnastics scoring, pointing out that discretionary deductions might hurt the sport’s entertainment value.
Dunne emphasized her commitment to the growth of women’s sports in the NCAA. She suggested that improving transparency in scoring could boost crowd engagement and increase viewership.
Challenges in NCAA Gymnastics
While Dunne’s comments have brought attention to the new scoring system, they have also highlighted broader issues within NCAA gymnastics. These challenges include:
Find the best accommodations
Check availability at 5* hotels, guest houses and apartments rated "superb" or "exceptional" by visitors just like you.
NO RESERVATION FEES
CHECK AVAILABILITY FOR YOUR DATES HERE
- Attendance: NCAA women’s gymnastics struggles with attendance due to its niche nature, high ticket prices, and competition from bigger sports like basketball and football.
- Limited Streaming: The sport receives less funding and media attention compared to more popular sports, resulting in fewer resources for quality broadcasts.
- Commentary: The lack of strong commentary can make the sport less appealing and accessible to casual fans.
- Uneven Competition: Dominance by a few powerhouse programs makes competitions feel predictable and less exciting.
- Scheduling: Weekday meets and a short season limit exposure and fan engagement.
Examples of Scoring Inconsistencies
Several high-profile examples of scoring inconsistencies have fueled the debate about the need for reform in NCAA gymnastics. In 2023, famous gymnast Jade Carey earned two perfect 10s in a meet against Arizona, despite a controversial floor routine that should have resulted in a deduction.
Similarly, Chloi Clark from the University of Florida received a nearly perfect score for a vault with a clear deduction.
Impact on Fan Engagement
Dunne compared the frequent deductions in gymnastics to constant penalties in basketball or football, which can take away from the excitement. She argued that a more straightforward and less interruption-heavy system would keep fans coming back and help grow the sport’s viewership.
Criticism and Support
Despite her valid points, Dunne’s comments have sparked criticism from some fans who feel her stance is disingenuous, given that she plans to leave gymnastics after her time at LSU.
However, some professionals in the field defend the integrity of the judging system. They argue that gymnastics without deductions wouldn’t truly be gymnastics.
Broader Issues in NCAA Gymnastics
While the new rules aim to address scoring inconsistencies, there are broader issues that need to be tackled to make NCAA gymnastics more engaging and accessible. These include improving commentary and streaming, addressing attendance and competition imbalances, and ensuring better scheduling.
Improving Commentary and Streaming
Quality commentary is crucial for helping casual fans understand the complexities of gymnastics, such as scoring and skill difficulty. Unfortunately, many broadcasts fall short in this regard.
Investing in knowledgeable commentators and better streaming infrastructure could make the sport more appealing to a broader audience.
Addressing Attendance and Competition Imbalances
To boost attendance, NCAA gymnastics needs to address high ticket prices and better market the sport. Additionally, efforts should be made to level the playing field between powerhouse programs and smaller teams, ensuring more competitive and exciting meets.
Ensuring Better Scheduling
Scheduling meets on weekends and extending the season beyond January to April could provide more opportunities for exposure and fan engagement. This would also allow for better marketing and promotion of the sport.
Conclusion
While Olivia Dunne raises valid points about scoring and transparency in NCAA gymnastics, there are bigger issues at play that need to be addressed.
Improving commentary and streaming and tackling attendance and competition imbalances are essential to making the sport more engaging and accessible. The recent rule changes are a step in the right direction, but continuous improvements are necessary to elevate the profile of NCAA women’s gymnastics.
For more details on Olivia Dunne’s comments and the state of NCAA gymnastics, you can read the full article here.
Get the latest sent right to your inbox
- Schools Covered
- College Football Articles
- Men's College Basketball Articles
- Men's College Soccer Articles
- Women's College Basketball Articles
- Olympic Athlete Articles
- Men's College Baseball Articles
- College Sports Media Professionals Articles
- Hall of Fame Member Articles
- Former College Player Articles
- Game Previews