For nearly 75 years, the Associated Press (AP) has been a cornerstone in college basketball. They provide weekly rankings that spark intriguing storylines and debates among fans. However, with the advent of advanced technology and computer rankings, the relevance of the AP Top 25 poll is being questioned.
The Historical Significance of the AP Poll
The AP poll has been a staple in college basketball for decades, offering fans and teams a benchmark to measure their success throughout the season. Although it has no bearing on the postseason, the AP Top 25 poll has been instrumental in creating high-profile matchups and fueling discussions among fans. Every Monday, fans eagerly await the updated rankings to see where their team stands.
The Evolution of Ranking Systems
As college basketball has evolved, so have the methods for ranking teams. Advanced computer algorithms and unique formulas have given rise to websites like KenPom, Bart Torvik, Haslametrics, and EvanMiya. These platforms provide daily rankings for all 364 Division-I programs, offering a more comprehensive view of team performance. The NCAA’s own NET ranking system is also used by the NCAA Tournament selection committee to assemble the 68-team field for March Madness.
Computer Rankings vs. Human Polls
While computer rankings have gained acceptance in college basketball circles, they are not without their criticisms. However, they offer a level of objectivity that human polls cannot match. For instance, the NET, KenPom, and Torvik rankings often align with each other, unlike the AP poll, which can sometimes reflect the biases and inconsistencies of human voters.
Case Studies: Kentucky and Duke
The recent rankings have sparked debates about the validity of the AP poll. Kentucky, despite a thrilling overtime victory over Gonzaga, dropped to No. 5, while Duke, which lost to Kentucky, remained ahead at No. 4. This discrepancy highlights the limitations of human judgment in ranking teams. Computer rankings, on the other hand, consistently placed Duke ahead of Kentucky, reflecting a more data-driven approach.
Inconsistencies in the AP Poll
The AP poll has shown inconsistencies that have baffled fans and analysts alike. For example, UConn remained in the top 25 despite losing three consecutive games to unranked opponents. One voter even placed the Huskies in the top 10, a decision that defies logic given their recent performance. Similarly, Oregon did not move in the rankings despite a loss to UCLA, while UCLA was promoted for the same game.
The Impact of Preseason Bias
Preseason biases often influence the AP poll, leading to rankings that may not accurately reflect a team’s current performance. UConn’s high ranking, for instance, was largely based on their status as back-to-back national champions rather than their recent nonconference wins. In contrast, Bart Torvik’s rankings, which remove preseason biases, placed UConn much lower, offering a more accurate assessment of their current form.
The Future of College Basketball Rankings
Given the limitations and inconsistencies of the AP poll, many are calling for a shift towards computer-based rankings. These systems offer a more objective and data-driven approach, reducing the influence of human biases. While the AP poll has its place in generating buzz and excitement, it may be time for a change in how we rank college basketball teams.
The Role of Advanced Metrics
Advanced metrics used by computer rankings provide a more nuanced understanding of team performance. These metrics consider various factors, such as strength of schedule, margin of victory, and other statistical indicators, offering a comprehensive view of a team’s capabilities. This approach is particularly useful in a sport as unpredictable as college basketball.
Conclusion
As college basketball continues to evolve, so too should the methods we use to rank teams.
While the AP poll has been a beloved tradition, its limitations are becoming increasingly apparent.
Advanced computer rankings offer a more objective and accurate way to assess team performance. It may be time for the college basketball community to embrace these modern methodologies.
For more in-depth analysis on this topic, you can read the full article on Sports Illustrated.
Get the latest sent right to your inbox